菲利克斯 发表于 2021-4-15 16:01

请教一下德国剥被帽实验的细节

网上找不到ADM 213/951这份资料,看神教的精华帖ADM 213/951这份报告里德国人认为需要至少100mm的装甲才能剥掉38cm被帽穿甲弹的被帽,而英国人在ADM 281/31 认为在30°入射角下,40磅装甲可以剥去9.2寸的被帽,那么德国人的报告有没有涉及到入射角的问题呢。

qwevb 发表于 2021-4-16 21:30



这张图的浅黄色部分是okun对德国剥被帽实验的总结,100mm剥380大概是45度角度

qwevb 发表于 2021-4-16 21:36

okun原文:http://www.warships.com.cn/navweaps/tech-085.htm

(3) TYPE 2 HARD CAPS. These are hard caps that seem to be identical in every way to those of the Type 1 group, except that they take about double the thickness of plate to knock them off at 30-45° obliquity and about 50-75% more to knock them off at normal and at over 45° obliquity.The Type 2 hard-capped projectiles are, to my current knowledge, made up of ONLY the following:

(1) All Krupp Psgr.m.K. (AP shell with AP cap) designs that have a hard cap, starting with their 1911 28 cm Psgr.m.K. L/3,2 (28.3 cm (11.14") AP shell with AP cap of length 3.2 calibers) and its slightly longer and later World War I "brothers", the 30.5 cm and 38 cm Psgr.m.K. L/3,4 (12" and 14.96" AP shells with AP caps of length 3.4 calibers). All earlier Krupp projectiles with AP caps had soft caps. This includes both World War I and World War II Krupp Navy and World War II Krupp Army APC projectiles, which resemble each other in many ways very closely.

(2) The U.S. Navy 3" AP Mark 29 and Mark 30 projectiles were very similar in design, differing only in the use of a U.S. Army M66 BDF in the Mark 30, probably for use in their 3" anti-tank gun, which later was also added to the Mark 29 shells used by the Navy (for shooting at surfaced submarines, primarily, which had rather strong armor-grade steel in their hulls and, in some cases, armored conning towers). Originally, the Mark 29 had only an inert filler and no fuze.No AP projectile (small filler cavity with an AP cap) of this size had ever been made for the U.S. Navy before and they did not have their own base fuzes.

(3) The U.S. Army 76.2-mm (3") M62 APC projectile used in its anti-tank guns and in the medium-length 76.2-mm gun that replaced the short 75-mm gun in the later M4 Sherman tanks.

While it is possible that some other projectiles, especially World War II U.S. Army APC projectiles, also fall into the Type 2 category, I do not have any data, except that the 37-mm M49 and M51 APC projectiles and the 75-mm M61 APC projectiles are most definitely Type 1 designs.也就是说这里的type2就是指ADM 213/951所提到38cm穿甲弹所用的被帽设计类型,相比ADM 281/31中用的英国被帽更难剥除

菲利克斯 发表于 2021-4-17 19:29

qwevb 发表于 2021-4-16 21:36
okun原文:http://www.warships.com.cn/navweaps/tech-085.htm

也就是说这里的type2就是指ADM 213/951所提 ...

多谢
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 请教一下德国剥被帽实验的细节