看DK Brown的Nelson to Vanguard有一事不解

Horizonwalker

在战列舰章的最后一部分，有这么一段：
A small committee was set upto study the requirements of a smaller battleship of about 44,000 tons. They took a sea lords' minute of May 1944 as their starting point: 'the basis of the strength of the fleet is the battleship....Ａ heavier  broadside than the enemy is still a very tellling weapon in a naval action.' Armament was reduced to sis 16inch in two triples forward, the belt came down to 12.5ins but a 6in deck was retianed (with 4in over machinery) and speed, standard, to 29kt. It was hoped this would equate to 45,000 tons. There were still hipesfor a final class of four ships. Ther 1945 programe included two such ships at 13,250,000 each but it never reached the Cabinet".
一艘四万五千吨（姑且算满排）左右的战列舰，是为了什么把16寸主炮削到六门，主装砍到12.5寸（假设新任DNC Charles Lillicrap采取了倾斜设计），航速还高不成低不就的？

猫失前爪

12座双联装高射炮？

Claret

都1944年了，只能是各种脑洞了，反正不会造

Error_404

反正又不會真的造出來吧

CVAN72

也许是带有妖孽的水平装甲？

Hartmann

会不会是强化了KGV等船的炮塔，炮座装甲和水平防护

funk1999

请注意文中的造价：两艘为1325万英镑。每艘662.5万。平均每吨造价150英镑！！！
而37年开工的乔五设计造价是200英镑每吨。44年的反而便宜一大截？只能说这只是一个压根不成熟的空想方案而已。根本不具有现实意义。

Candybag

funk1999 发表于 2015-11-9 17:11
请注意文中的造价：两艘为1325万英镑。每艘662.5万。平均每吨造价150英镑！！！
而37年开工的乔五设计造价 ...

included two such ships at 13,250,000 each but it never reached the Cabinet
贴吧水平，嗯嗯。

funk1999

Candybag 发表于 2015-11-10 15:10
included two such ships at 13,250,000 each but it never reached the Cabinet
贴吧水平，嗯嗯。 ...

好吧，是我看文不仔细。多谢指正。

L.U

一艘四万五千吨（姑且算满排）左右的战列舰，是为了什么把16寸主炮削到六门，主装砍到12.5寸（假设新任DNC Charles Lillicrap采取了倾斜设计），航速还高不成低不就的？


如果是满排，并且不像IOWA一样采取较高的长宽比，同时还有较厚的水平装甲，并在standard情况下跑出29节，我不认为存在严重浪费排水量