四联装 发表于 2012-5-24 10:24 static/image/common/back.gif
人家楼主要求：续航力最低不得低于9500海里（19节）。
腿短的，老老实实在码头停着 ...
黎塞留号最多可装载6905吨重油，其续航力为：10000英里/12节，9500英里/15节，7750英里/20节，4800英里/25节以及 3300英里/30节。
勉强够用啊{:17:}。实在不行稍微加一些{:44:}
http://www.warships.com.cn/data/attachment/forum/201112/20/191609rgodg10d74rr300b.jpg
BB laid down 1932
Displacement:
31,147 t light; 32,855 t standard; 36,445 t normal; 39,316 t full load
Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(946.03 ft / 918.64 ft) x 98.43 ft x (32.81 / 34.51 ft)
(288.35 m / 280.00 m) x 30.00 mx (10.00 / 10.52 m)
Armament:
8 - 14.02" / 356 mm 45.0 cal guns - 1,388.37lbs / 629.75kg shells, 150 per gun
Breech loading guns in deck mounts, 1932 Model
4 x 2-gun mounts on centreline ends, evenly spread
2 raised mounts - superfiring
20 - 5.00" / 127 mm 55.0 cal guns - 59.07lbs / 26.79kg shells, 150 per gun
Breech loading guns in deck mounts, 1932 Model
10 x Single mounts on sides, evenly spread
20 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm 45.0 cal guns - 1.97lbs / 0.89kg shells, 150 per gun
Breech loading guns in deck mounts, 1932 Model
10 x Twin mounts on centreline, evenly spread
40 - 0.91" / 23.0 mm 45.0 cal guns - 0.37lbs / 0.17kg shells, 150 per gun
Breech loading guns in deck mounts, 1932 Model
40 x Single mounts on sides, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 11,752 lbs / 5,331 kg
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 15.0" / 380 mm 569.55 ft / 253.60 m 15.58 ft / 4.75 m
Ends: 0.79" / 20 mm 349.05 ft / 36.39 m 12.30 ft / 3.75 m
Upper: 4.72" / 120 mm 569.55 ft / 223.60 m 8.01 ft / 2.44 m
Main Belt covers 95% of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead - Additional damage containing bulkheads:
1.97" / 50 mm 569.55 ft / 173.60 m 30.12 ft / 9.18 m
Beam between torpedo bulkheads 91.86 ft / 28.00 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 15.7" / 400 mm 8.66" / 220 mm 15.7" / 400 mm
- Armoured deck - multiple decks:
For and Aft decks: 4.72" / 130 mm
Forecastle: 4.72" / 120 mmQuarter deck: 4.72" / 120 mm
- Conning towers: Forward 17.72" / 450 mm, Aft 0.00" / 0 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Electric cruising motors plus geared drives, 4 shafts, 111,057 shp / 82,848 Kw = 30.00 kts
Range 12,000nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 6,461 tons
Complement:
1,318 - 1,714
Cost:
£9.519 million / $38.075 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 1,354 tons, 3.7%
- Guns: 1,354 tons, 3.7%
Armour: 14,251 tons, 39.1%
- Belts: 6,544 tons, 18.0%
- Torpedo bulkhead: 1,249 tons, 3.4%
- Armament: 845 tons, 2.3%
- Armour Deck: 5,193 tons, 14.2%
- Conning Tower: 420 tons, 1.2%
Machinery: 3,278 tons, 9.0%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 12,264 tons, 33.7%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 5,298 tons, 14.5%
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0%
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
95,287 lbs / 43,222 Kg = 69.2 x 14.0 " / 356 mm shells or 17.6 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.37
Metacentric height 8.5 ft / 2.6 m
Roll period: 14.2 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.26
Seaboat quality(Average = 1.00): 1.58
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck,
an extended bulbous bow and large transom stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0.430 / 0.441
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.33 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 35.10 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 40 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 44
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 32.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 6.56 ft / 2.00 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle: 20.00%,33.33 ft / 10.16 m,27.26 ft / 8.31 m
- Forward deck: 30.00%,27.26 ft / 8.31 m,21.23 ft / 6.47 m
- Aft deck: 32.00%,21.23 ft / 6.47 m,21.23 ft / 6.47 m
- Quarter deck: 18.00%,21.23 ft / 6.47 m,21.23 ft / 6.47 m
- Average freeboard: 23.83 ft / 7.26 m
Ship tends to be wet forward
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 49.1%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 193.3%
Waterplane Area: 58,954 Square feet or 5,477 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 140%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 151 lbs/sq ft or 735 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 1.00
- Longitudinal: 1.13
- Overall: 1.01
Excellent machinery, storage, compartmentation space
Excellent accommodation and workspace room
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather
觉得356小的话，可以换380
本帖最后由 四联装 于 2012-5-24 13:48 编辑
yxwd5 发表于 2012-5-24 11:18 static/image/common/back.gif
黎塞留号最多可装载6905吨重油，其续航力为：10000英里/12节，9500英里/15节，7750英里/20节，4800英里/2 ...
黎塞留的续航力数据是英里不是海里。折算过来就是：
8695海里/12节，8260海里/15节，6738海里/20节，4173海里/25节以及2870海里/30节。
上述接近的是20节6738海里，只有2/3强。
楼主要求的19节9500海里，实际上要求是相当高的。估计美国造的也要7000吨以上燃油，其它国家差不多需要10000吨燃油。
（如果俾斯麦的19节8525节续航力是6450吨燃油实现的话，德国估计也只需要7200-7500吨。）
用柴油机做巡航动力，是不错的选择。
四联装 发表于 2012-5-24 13:34 static/image/common/back.gif
黎塞留的续航力数据是英里不是海里。折算过来就是：
8695海里/12节，8260海里/15节，6738海里/20节，4173 ...
要不，你看加一条油轮怎么样{:44:}
斯佩伯爵 发表于 2012-5-23 23:01 static/image/common/back.gif
给你个建议啊，其实战巡最好还是双舰编队比较好！
两艘战列巡洋舰和一艘希佩尔海军上将级组成的巡洋作战编队如何？
chunhim_lai 发表于 2012-5-23 22:07 static/image/common/back.gif
不用16寸炮難以pk Hood
另外超甲巡的三聯裝12寸炮塔設計上可直接裝上聯裝16寸炮 ...
二战中最渣的34也肯定比HOOD的老15寸好。
xsuny 发表于 2012-5-24 11:44 static/image/common/back.gif
觉得356小的话，可以换380
谢谢xsunny前辈，个人认为还是换装15寸放心一点。
克劳塞维茨 发表于 2012-5-24 18:48 static/image/common/back.gif
谢谢xsunny前辈，个人认为还是换装15寸放心一点。
战训的话用C34足矣，不过炮塔外形设计得改改了
克劳塞维茨 发表于 2012-5-24 18:42 static/image/common/back.gif
两艘战列巡洋舰和一艘希佩尔海军上将级组成的巡洋作战编队如何？
用希佩尔有点大了，用俩个远洋轻巡比较好
斯佩伯爵 发表于 2012-5-24 18:52 static/image/common/back.gif
用希佩尔有点大了，用俩个远洋轻巡比较好
德军轻巡洋舰航程蛋疼完全无法用作巡洋作战啊，所以才去xsunny的公司订购了远洋作战型轻巡啊。
克劳塞维茨 发表于 2012-5-24 18:48 static/image/common/back.gif
谢谢xsunny前辈，个人认为还是换装15寸放心一点。
ok
克虏伯火炮 发表于 2012-5-23 20:31 static/image/common/back.gif
3联装310,1000吨以上应该也算正常。
炮塔重量与火炮威力、相邻或炮间距、装甲厚度都有关系。
其中似乎火炮 ...
感谢前辈科普{:44:}
太客气啦。
xsuny 发表于 2012-5-24 20:25 static/image/common/back.gif
ok
感谢前辈如此用心，我坚信该型战舰一定会发挥巨大的作用的！
克劳塞维茨 发表于 2012-5-24 18:43
二战中最渣的34也肯定比HOOD的老15寸好。
改作kgv14寸炮
強化主炮裝甲ok?
chunhim_lai 发表于 2012-5-25 21:52 static/image/common/back.gif
改作kgv14寸炮
強化主炮裝甲ok?
还不如用神炮330呢
chunhim_lai 发表于 2012-5-25 21:52 static/image/common/back.gif
改作kgv14寸炮
強化主炮裝甲ok?
还不如上C34
yxwd5 发表于 2012-5-25 23:01 static/image/common/back.gif
还不如用神炮330呢
珍爱生命，谢绝传销——{:24:}
chunhim_lai 发表于 2012-5-25 21:52 static/image/common/back.gif
改作kgv14寸炮
強化主炮裝甲ok?
没必要搞的那么渣吧，15寸是我的底线。