看DK Brown的Nelson to Vanguard有一事不解
在战列舰章的最后一部分，有这么一段：A small committee was set upto study the requirements of a smaller battleship of about 44,000 tons. They took a sea lords' minute of May 1944 as their starting point: 'the basis of the strength of the fleet is the battleship....Ａ heavierbroadside than the enemy is still a very tellling weapon in a naval action.' Armament was reduced to sis 16inch in two triples forward, the belt came down to 12.5ins but a 6in deck was retianed (with 4in over machinery) and speed, standard, to 29kt. It was hoped this would equate to 45,000 tons. There were still hipesfor a final class of four ships. Ther 1945 programe included two such ships at 13,250,000 each but it never reached the Cabinet".
一艘四万五千吨（姑且算满排）左右的战列舰，是为了什么把16寸主炮削到六门，主装砍到12.5寸（假设新任DNC Charles Lillicrap采取了倾斜设计），航速还高不成低不就的？
12座双联装高射炮？ 都1944年了，只能是各种脑洞了，反正不会造 反正又不會真的造出來吧 也许是带有妖孽的水平装甲？ 会不会是强化了KGV等船的炮塔，炮座装甲和水平防护 请注意文中的造价：两艘为1325万英镑。每艘662.5万。平均每吨造价150英镑！！！
而37年开工的乔五设计造价是200英镑每吨。44年的反而便宜一大截？只能说这只是一个压根不成熟的空想方案而已。根本不具有现实意义。 funk1999 发表于 2015-11-9 17:11
请注意文中的造价：两艘为1325万英镑。每艘662.5万。平均每吨造价150英镑！！！
而37年开工的乔五设计造价 ...
included two such ships at 13,250,000 each but it never reached the Cabinet
贴吧水平，嗯嗯。 Candybag 发表于 2015-11-10 15:10
included two such ships at 13,250,000 each but it never reached the Cabinet
贴吧水平，嗯嗯。 ...
好吧，是我看文不仔细。多谢指正。 一艘四万五千吨（姑且算满排）左右的战列舰，是为了什么把16寸主炮削到六门，主装砍到12.5寸（假设新任DNC Charles Lillicrap采取了倾斜设计），航速还高不成低不就的？
如果是满排，并且不像IOWA一样采取较高的长宽比，同时还有较厚的水平装甲，并在standard情况下跑出29节，我不认为存在严重浪费排水量
页:
[1]